Disclosure Issues
In both commercial and residential real estate sales, proper disclosure by the seller of defects in the property is essential. Many non-disclosure problems can be avoided by the usage of forms such as the Arizona Association of Realtors’ Seller Property Disclosure Statement (“SPDS”), developed for commercial, vacant land, and residential transactions.
If there is a wrongful failure by the seller to disclose a defect in of real property, the buyer may have a fraud claim which could warrant punitive damages. For fraudulent non-disclosures, e.g., inadequate roof repairs, the statute of limitations is generally three years.
Frequently Asked Questions about Disclosure Issues
Under Arizona law a seller is required to disclose any material and adverse fact relating to the condition of the property that a reasonable buyer would want to know, e.g., Commercial traffic, neighborhood odor problems, etc.
No. Under common law disclosure principles a seller of real property must disclose to a buyer any material, adverse fact affecting the value of the real property. Unlike some states, in Arizona a formal SPDS is not required by statute. Note: the seller’s SPDS, however, is valuable for disclosure of more than just the material, adverse facts, e.g., the identities of utility providers and any transferable termite warranty.
Answer: No. Under A.R.S. §32-2156 a landlord is not required to disclose that leased property is “located in the vicinity of a sex offender.” Therefore, a property manager has no liability for failing to disclose this registered sex offender to future tenants in the apartment complex.
Yes. The seller has a duty to disclose known facts that materially affect the value of the home that are not readily observable and that are not known to the buyer. In addition, if a buyer asks a seller a specific question about the home, the seller has a duty to disclose all information, i.e., answer honestly, regardless of whether or not the seller considers the information material.
No. The recovering alcoholics in the halfway house are "disabled," and therefore are members of a protected class under the fair housing laws. See A.R.S. § 41-1491(5). Therefore, the seller and the real estate brokers are prohibited from disclosing the existence of this halfway house, similar to the prohibition against disclosing individuals in the neighborhood of a certain race, religion, sex, or any other protected class.
RELATED ARTICLES
Statute of Limitations Regarding Liability of Sellers and Brokers
Question: Your column recently discussed the liability of the seller for failure to disclose to the buyer that the City of Chandler had not approved the completion of the garage. In another column you discussed the liability of the seller and the real estate broker for failing to disclose to…
Read More >>Confirm Not Only Permit Issued But Construction Completed
Question: When we purchased our East Valley home, the Seller’s Property Disclosure Statement (“SPDS”), line 150, said that there was a permit from the City of Chandler for the construction of the 2,000-square-foot detached garage. The SPDS, line 155, said that the detached garage had been “completed.” We want to…
Read More >>What Our Clients Are Saying
Chelsea - Thank you for your hard work and support in resolving our matter. Your dedication and perseverance is much appreciated.
We just wanted to write you and send a BIG thank you for all of your help in bringing this to a reasonable settlement today. We were extremely pleased with Chelsea's representation, and her superior skills today in negotiation. Also, a big thank you to everyone that worked behind the scenes to get this done.
Thank you again, Chelsea and Combs Law Group. You've been fantastic to work with.
Call us (602) 957-9810
OR


Phone: (602) 957-9810
Fax: (602) 955-4712
Email: info@combslawgroup.com
Address:
2200 East Camelback Rd.
Suite 221
Phoenix, AZ 85016
Sign up to stay in touch!
Sign up to get Arizona Republic articles written by Chris Combs and other real estate news delivered to your inbox.